BGR vs SCHD
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. BGR delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGR | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.11% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $473M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.42% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +27.08% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.26% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.73% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2004 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BGR vs SCHD Performance
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, BGR is up 27.08% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, BGR compounded at +18.73% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +21.67% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.7% for BGR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGR charges 1.11% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $111 vs $6 annually, a gap of $105 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGR currently yields 6.42% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGR or SCHD?
BGR has an expense ratio of 1.11% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $105 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGR or SCHD?
Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so BGR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BGR annualized -0.18% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGR or SCHD?
BGR has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BGR -87.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BGR and SCHD?
BGR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGR and SCHD?
BGR and SCHD share 2 common holdings with a 7.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGR or SCHD?
BGR yields 6.42% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so BGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.