BGR vs IVV
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BGR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $473M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.42% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +27.08% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.26% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.73% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2004 | May 15, 2000 |
BGR vs IVV Performance
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, BGR is up 27.08% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, BGR compounded at +18.73% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +21.67% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.7% for BGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGR charges 1.11% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $111 vs $3 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGR currently yields 6.42% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BGR and IVV share 9 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGR or IVV?
BGR has an expense ratio of 1.11% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $108 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGR or IVV?
Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% vs +21.79% for IVV, so BGR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), BGR annualized -0.18% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGR or IVV?
BGR has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BGR -87.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BGR and IVV?
BGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGR and IVV?
BGR and IVV share 9 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGR or IVV?
BGR yields 6.42% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.