BGR vs VOO
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BGR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $473M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.42% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +27.08% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.26% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.73% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 23, 2004 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BGR vs VOO Performance
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, BGR is up 27.08% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, BGR compounded at +18.73% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +21.67% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.7% for BGR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGR charges 1.11% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $111 vs $3 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGR currently yields 6.42% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BGR and VOO share 9 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGR or VOO?
BGR has an expense ratio of 1.11% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $108 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGR or VOO?
Over the past year BGR returned +35.26% vs +21.79% for VOO, so BGR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BGR annualized -0.18% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGR or VOO?
BGR has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BGR -87.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BGR and VOO?
BGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGR and VOO?
BGR and VOO share 9 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGR or VOO?
BGR yields 6.42% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.