BILD vs QQQ
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BILD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $8M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.76% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +7.97% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.71% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BILD vs QQQ Performance
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is a ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BILD returned +13.71% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, BILD is up 7.97% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.3% for BILD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BILD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BILD charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BILD currently yields 4.76% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BILD and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 145 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BILD or QQQ?
BILD has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BILD or QQQ?
Over the past year BILD returned +13.71% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BILD annualized +10.00% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BILD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.3% for BILD. Worst drawdown: BILD -17.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BILD and QQQ?
BILD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BILD and QQQ?
BILD and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 145 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BILD or QQQ?
BILD yields 4.76% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BILD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.