BILD vs IVV
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BILD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.76% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.58% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.02% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BILD vs IVV Performance
Nomura Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is a ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BILD returned +14.02% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BILD is up 8.58% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.3% for BILD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BILD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BILD charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BILD currently yields 4.76% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BILD and IVV share 12 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BILD or IVV?
BILD has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BILD or IVV?
Over the past year BILD returned +14.02% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BILD annualized +10.26% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BILD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.3% for BILD. Worst drawdown: BILD -17.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BILD and IVV?
BILD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BILD and IVV?
BILD and IVV share 12 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BILD or IVV?
BILD yields 4.76% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BILD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.