BKF vs QQQ
iShares MSCI BIC ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BKF offers more diversification with 669 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $75M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 712 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -9.37% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.05% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.50% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.83% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BKF vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BKF returned -2.05% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, BKF is down 9.37% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, BKF compounded at +7.50% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.83% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs -1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.2% for BKF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.4% for BKF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKF charges 0.72% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $18 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKF currently yields 1.63% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BKF and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 771 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKF | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | 1.10% | 0.25% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKF or QQQ?
BKF has an expense ratio of 0.72% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKF or QQQ?
Over the past year BKF returned -2.05% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BKF annualized -1.31% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.2% for BKF. Worst drawdown: BKF -70.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BKF and QQQ?
BKF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKF and QQQ?
BKF and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 771 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKF or QQQ?
BKF yields 1.63% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.