BKF vs VOO
iShares MSCI BIC ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKF or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKF is less concentrated, with 26.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 712 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -11.09% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.34% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.66% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.48% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,820 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.3%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
BKF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BKF vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKF returned -8.34% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, BKF is down 11.09% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, BKF compounded at +6.66% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -2.48% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs -0.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.1% for BKF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKF charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKF currently yields 1.56% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of BKF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.0% of VOO's money is in holdings BKF also owns.
VOO and BKF share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 668 positions we hold weights for in BKF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 712 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BKF (97.5% of the fund), and 12 for BKF that do not appear in VOO (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKF or VOO?
BKF has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKF or VOO?
Over the past year BKF returned -8.34% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BKF annualized -0.06% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKF or VOO?
BKF has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BKF -53.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKF and VOO?
BKF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKF and VOO?
2.0% of VOO's money is in holdings BKF also owns. 2.0% of VOO's is in holdings BKF also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 668 positions we hold weights for in BKF and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKF or VOO?
BKF yields 1.56% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BKF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKF is less concentrated, with 26.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.