BKF vs VXUS
iShares MSCI BIC ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $75M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 712 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -8.74% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.10% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.76% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.93% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BKF vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKF returned -0.10% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, BKF is down 8.74% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, BKF compounded at +7.76% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.93% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.4% for BKF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKF charges 0.72% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $5 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKF currently yields 1.63% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BKF and VXUS share 417 holdings out of 8113 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKF | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9988:HK | 4.77% | 0.73% | 4.04% |
| RELIANCE:MB | 1.96% | 0.24% | 1.72% |
| ICICIBANK:MB | 1.86% | 0.18% | 1.68% |
| BHARTIARTL:MB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 1398:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| VALE3:BV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PDD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 3690:SH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| ITUB4:BV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 3988:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKF or VXUS?
BKF has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKF or VXUS?
Over the past year BKF returned -0.10% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BKF annualized -1.28% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKF or VXUS?
BKF has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BKF -70.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BKF and VXUS?
BKF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKF and VXUS?
BKF and VXUS share 417 common holdings with a 5.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8113 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKF or VXUS?
BKF yields 1.63% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.