BKF vs IVV
iShares MSCI BIC ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BKF offers more diversification with 669 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $75M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 712 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.31% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.46% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.00% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.53% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
BKF vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKF returned +1.46% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, BKF is down 7.31% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, BKF compounded at +8.00% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.53% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.4% for BKF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKF charges 0.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKF currently yields 1.63% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BKF and IVV share 3 holdings out of 1171 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKF or IVV?
BKF has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKF or IVV?
Over the past year BKF returned +1.46% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BKF annualized -1.19% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKF or IVV?
BKF has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKF -70.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BKF and IVV?
BKF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKF and IVV?
BKF and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1171 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKF or IVV?
BKF yields 1.63% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.