BKF vs IVV
iShares MSCI BIC ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKF or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKF is less concentrated, with 26.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 712 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -10.40% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | -7.59% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.94% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.38% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -70.4% | -55.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,865 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.3%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2007 to Sep 9, 2026 (18.8 years).
BKF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.8 years both funds cover.
BKF vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKF returned -7.59% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, BKF is down 10.40% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, BKF compounded at +6.94% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.38% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.65% annualized vs -1.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.4% for BKF and -55.3% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKF charges 0.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKF currently yields 1.56% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
1.5% of BKF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BKF also owns.
IVV and BKF share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 668 positions we hold weights for in BKF and 505 in IVV, against full books of 712 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BKF (97.2% of the fund), and 11 for BKF that do not appear in IVV (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKF and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKF or IVV?
BKF has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKF or IVV?
Over the past year BKF returned -7.59% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BKF annualized -1.37% vs +9.65% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKF or IVV?
BKF has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKF -70.4% vs IVV -55.3%.
Should I hold both BKF and IVV?
BKF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKF and IVV?
2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BKF also owns. 2.2% of IVV's is in holdings BKF also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 668 positions we hold weights for in BKF and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKF or IVV?
BKF yields 1.56% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BKF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKF is less concentrated, with 26.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.