BKIE vs QQQ
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BKIE has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BKIE offers more diversification with 1,001 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKIE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.86% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -61.78% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -58.69% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.85% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.36% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BKIE vs QQQ Performance
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BKIE returned -58.69% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, BKIE is down 61.78% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, BKIE compounded at -16.85% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -11.36% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs -3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKIE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.8% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BKIE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKIE charges 0.04% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $18 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKIE currently yields 4.86% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BKIE and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 961 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKIE or QQQ?
BKIE has an expense ratio of 0.04% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BKIE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKIE or QQQ?
Over the past year BKIE returned -58.69% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKIE annualized -3.15% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKIE or QQQ?
BKIE has been the more volatile fund at 30.8% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BKIE -67.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BKIE and QQQ?
BKIE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKIE and QQQ?
BKIE and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 961 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKIE or QQQ?
BKIE yields 4.86% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BKIE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.