BKSE vs IVV
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKSE or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BKSE led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKSE is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKSE | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $88M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 598 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.09%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +18.76%Best | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.83% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,396 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 3.6%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2020 to Sep 16, 2026 (6.4 years).
BKSE vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BKSE vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKSE returned +18.76% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, BKSE is up 13.09% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, BKSE compounded at +16.83% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +18.19% annualized vs +15.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for BKSE and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKSE charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKSE currently yields 1.85% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 584 holdings in BKSE and 490 in IVV, totalling 97.5% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 584 positions we hold weights for in BKSE and 490 in IVV, against full books of 598 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BKSE (98.6% of the fund), and 563 for BKSE that do not appear in IVV (94.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKSE and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKSE or IVV?
BKSE has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKSE or IVV?
Over the past year BKSE returned +18.76% vs +15.62% for IVV, so BKSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKSE annualized +15.50% vs +18.19% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKSE or IVV?
BKSE has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKSE -29.1% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both BKSE and IVV?
BKSE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKSE or IVV?
BKSE yields 1.85% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BKSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BKSE?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BKSE led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKSE is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.