BKSE vs VTI
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BKSE or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKSE is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKSE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,821 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +12.16% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.66% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.84% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.63% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,443 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 3.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 9, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.5 years).
BKSE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.5 years both funds cover.
BKSE vs VTI Performance
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKSE returned +15.66% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, BKSE is up 12.16% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, BKSE compounded at +18.84% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.63% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +18.08% annualized vs +15.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for BKSE and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKSE charges 0.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKSE currently yields 1.85% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.1% of BKSE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.0% of VTI's money is in holdings BKSE also owns.
Most of BKSE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
549 positions in common, counted across the 582 positions we hold weights for in BKSE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,821 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 849 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BKSE (94.5% of the fund), and 19 for BKSE that do not appear in VTI (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKSE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVTRAvantor Inc | 0.44% | 0.01% | 0.43% |
| EATBrinker International, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.01% | 0.39% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 0.37% | 0.01% | 0.36% |
| AVTAvnet Inc | 0.36% | 0.01% | 0.35% |
| GTLBGitlab Inc Cl A | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group Inc | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| NOVNov Inc Common Stock | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp. | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| TXG10x Genomics Inc Com Usd 1 Cl A | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| RHPRyman Healthcare Limited | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.32% |
93.1% of BKSE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKSE or VTI?
BKSE has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKSE or VTI?
Over the past year BKSE returned +15.66% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BKSE annualized +15.24% vs +18.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKSE or VTI?
BKSE has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BKSE -29.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BKSE and VTI?
BKSE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKSE and VTI?
93.1% of BKSE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.0% of VTI's is in holdings BKSE also owns. They hold 549 positions in common, counted across the 582 positions we hold weights for in BKSE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKSE or VTI?
BKSE yields 1.85% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BKSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BKSE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKSE is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.