BLCN vs QQQ
Siren NexGen Economy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $33M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.93% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.52% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.21% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | SRN Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BLCN vs QQQ Performance
Siren NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is a ETF from SRN Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BLCN is up 0.93% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, BLCN compounded at +2.07% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -11.21% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 28.1% for BLCN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BLCN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCN charges 0.68% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $18 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCN currently yields 2.71% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCN or QQQ?
BLCN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLCN or QQQ?
Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLCN annualized +1.11% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLCN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 28.1% for BLCN. Worst drawdown: BLCN -67.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BLCN and QQQ?
BLCN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCN and QQQ?
BLCN and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 5.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 122 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCN or QQQ?
BLCN yields 2.71% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BLCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.