BLCN vs VXUS
Siren NexGen Economy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $33M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.93% | +15.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.52% | +26.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +20.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.21% | +9.68% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | SRN Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BLCN vs VXUS Performance
Siren NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is a ETF from SRN Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% while VXUS returned +26.36%. Year to date, BLCN is up 0.93% versus a gain of 15.44% for VXUS.
Over three years, BLCN compounded at +2.07% per year against +20.98% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -11.21% and +9.68% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.90% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BLCN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCN charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCN currently yields 2.71% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BLCN and VXUS share 11 holdings out of 7880 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCN or VXUS?
BLCN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLCN or VXUS?
Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% vs +26.36% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLCN annualized +1.11% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLCN or VXUS?
BLCN has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BLCN -67.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BLCN and VXUS?
BLCN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCN and VXUS?
BLCN and VXUS share 11 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7880 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCN or VXUS?
BLCN yields 2.71% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so BLCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.