BLCN vs SCHD
Siren NexGen Economy ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCN | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $33M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.93% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.52% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.21% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | SRN Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BLCN vs SCHD Performance
Siren NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is a ETF from SRN Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, BLCN is up 0.93% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, BLCN compounded at +2.07% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -11.21% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BLCN and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCN charges 0.68% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $6 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCN currently yields 2.71% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BLCN and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 122 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCN or SCHD?
BLCN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLCN or SCHD?
Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLCN annualized +1.11% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLCN or SCHD?
BLCN has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BLCN -67.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BLCN and SCHD?
BLCN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCN and SCHD?
BLCN and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 122 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCN or SCHD?
BLCN yields 2.71% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.