BLCN vs VOO
Siren NexGen Economy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.93% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.52% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.21% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SRN Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BLCN vs VOO Performance
Siren NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is a ETF from SRN Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, BLCN is up 0.93% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, BLCN compounded at +2.07% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -11.21% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BLCN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCN charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCN currently yields 2.71% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BLCN and VOO share 6 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCN or VOO?
BLCN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLCN or VOO?
Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLCN annualized +1.11% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLCN or VOO?
BLCN has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BLCN -67.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BLCN and VOO?
BLCN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCN and VOO?
BLCN and VOO share 6 common holdings with a 7.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCN or VOO?
BLCN yields 2.71% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BLCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.