BLCN vs VTI
Siren NexGen Economy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.71% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.93% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.52% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -11.21% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SRN Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
BLCN vs VTI Performance
Siren NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is a ETF from SRN Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BLCN is up 0.93% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, BLCN compounded at +2.07% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -11.21% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for BLCN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCN charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCN currently yields 2.71% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BLCN and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2803 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCN or VTI?
BLCN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLCN or VTI?
Over the past year BLCN returned +0.52% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLCN annualized +1.11% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLCN or VTI?
BLCN has been the more volatile fund at 28.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BLCN -67.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BLCN and VTI?
BLCN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCN and VTI?
BLCN and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCN or VTI?
BLCN yields 2.71% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BLCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.