BLDX vs QQQ
Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BLDX or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. BLDX is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLDX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 39 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Impax Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BLDX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BLDX vs QQQ Performance
Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) is an ETF from Impax Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BLDX is up 3.71% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLDX charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of BLDX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 6.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings BLDX also owns.
QQQ and BLDX share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 39 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BLDX (90.8% of the fund), and 17 for BLDX that do not appear in QQQ (46.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BLDX and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLDX or QQQ?
BLDX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BLDX and QQQ?
6.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings BLDX also owns. 6.8% of QQQ's is in holdings BLDX also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 102 in QQQ.
Is QQQ better than BLDX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. BLDX is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.