BLDX vs VYM
Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BLDX or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLDX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 39 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Impax Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BLDX vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BLDX vs VYM Performance
Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) is an ETF from Impax Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BLDX is up 3.71% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLDX charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
22.1% of BLDX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.0% of VYM's money is in holdings BLDX also owns.
BLDX and VYM share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 602 in VYM, against full books of 39 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 562 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BLDX (94.3% of the fund), and 11 for BLDX that do not appear in VYM (23.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLDX | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 5.46% | 0.67% | 4.79% |
| AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc. | 5.01% | 0.11% | 4.90% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 3.51% | 0.76% | 2.75% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.82% | 0.99% | 0.83% |
| WMWaste Management Inc . | 2.27% | 0.34% | 1.93% |
| ENREnergizer Holdings Inc | 2.08% | 0.01% | 2.07% |
| OTISOtis Worldwide Corporation | 1.96% | 0.11% | 1.85% |
22.1% of BLDX is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLDX or VYM?
BLDX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BLDX and VYM?
22.1% of BLDX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.0% of VYM's is in holdings BLDX also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 602 in VYM.
Is VYM better than BLDX?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.