BLDX vs VTI

BLDX vs VTI

Which is better, BLDX or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBLDXVTI
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$117M$666.9B
Dividend Yield-1.03%
Holdings393,543
YTD Return+1.22%+14.00%Best
1Y Return-+16.88%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.75%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.68%
Top 10 Weight38.9%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyImpax Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 2, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BLDX vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BLDX vs VTI Performance

Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) is an ETF from Impax Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BLDX is up 1.22% versus a gain of 14.00% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BLDX charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

BLDX already in VTI46.7%
VTI already in BLDX6.5%

46.7% of BLDX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.5% of VTI's money is in holdings BLDX also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 39 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,134 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BLDX (91.0% of the fund), and 2 for BLDX that do not appear in VTI (5.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BLDXWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.56%4.79%3.23%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp5.46%0.24%5.22%
AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc.5.01%0.04%4.97%
NEENextera Energy Inc3.51%0.25%3.26%
WELLWelltower, Inc.3.16%0.23%2.93%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.3.20%0.09%3.11%
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.2.92%0.07%2.85%
WCN:CAWaste Connections Inc Common Stock Cad 02.73%0.06%2.67%
TTEKIndustrials (continued) Tetra Tech Inc.2.59%0.01%2.58%
WMWaste Mgmt2.27%0.13%2.14%

46.7% of BLDX is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BLDXVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BLDX or VTI?

BLDX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BLDX and VTI?

46.7% of BLDX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.5% of VTI's is in holdings BLDX also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 3,463 in VTI.

Is VTI better than BLDX?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.