BND vs EDV
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF vs Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
BND has a lower expense ratio. BND delivered stronger 1-year returns. BND offers more diversification with 10790 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BND | EDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $159.8B | $3.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.94% | 4.83% | |
| Holdings | 17,528 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | -0.61% | -5.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.81% | -5.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.14% | -4.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.29% | -12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -62.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Dec 6, 2007 |
BND vs EDV Performance
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BND returned +1.81% while EDV returned -5.10%. Year to date, BND is down 0.61% versus a loss of 5.78% for EDV.
Over three years, BND compounded at +4.14% per year against -4.63% for EDV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.29% and -12.45% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, BND has the edge at +0.67% annualized vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 4.6% for BND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BND and -62.0% for EDV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BND charges 0.03% per year while EDV charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BND currently yields 3.94% against 4.83% for EDV.
Holdings Overlap
BND and EDV share 0 holdings out of 10866 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BND or EDV?
BND has an expense ratio of 0.03% while EDV charges 0.05%. BND is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BND or EDV?
Over the past year BND returned +1.81% vs -5.10% for EDV, so BND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BND annualized +0.67% vs -1.49% for EDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BND or EDV?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 4.6% for BND. Worst drawdown: BND -19.6% vs EDV -62.0%.
Should I hold both BND and EDV?
BND and EDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BND and EDV?
BND and EDV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 10866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BND or EDV?
BND yields 3.94% while EDV yields 4.83%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.