BOE vs QQQ
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BOE offers more diversification with 169 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $757M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.56% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 169 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.95% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.25% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.96% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 26, 2005 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BOE vs QQQ Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust (BOE) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BOE returned +16.95% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, BOE is up 10.47% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, BOE compounded at +17.25% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.96% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs -1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.3% for BOE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.2% for BOE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOE charges 0.90% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $18 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOE currently yields 7.56% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BOE and QQQ share 8 holdings out of 145 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOE or QQQ?
BOE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOE or QQQ?
Over the past year BOE returned +16.95% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), BOE annualized -1.32% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.3% for BOE. Worst drawdown: BOE -76.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BOE and QQQ?
BOE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOE and QQQ?
BOE and QQQ share 8 common holdings with a 18.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 145 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOE or QQQ?
BOE yields 7.56% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.