BOE vs VTI
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $757M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 169 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.19% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.40% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.52% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.87% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 26, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
BOE vs VTI Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust (BOE) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOE returned +17.40% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, BOE is up 11.19% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, BOE compounded at +17.52% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.87% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.2% for BOE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOE charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOE currently yields 7.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BOE and VTI share 26 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOE or VTI?
BOE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOE or VTI?
Over the past year BOE returned +17.40% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), BOE annualized -1.29% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOE or VTI?
BOE has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BOE -76.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BOE and VTI?
BOE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOE and VTI?
BOE and VTI share 26 common holdings with a 18.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOE or VTI?
BOE yields 7.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.