BSV vs VV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF vs Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSV offers more diversification with 2787 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSV | VV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44.8B | $52.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | 1.25% | |
| Holdings | 3,125 | 446 | |
| YTD Return | +0.41% | +13.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.34% | +23.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.28% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.59% | +12.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Jan 27, 2004 |
BSV vs VV Performance
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV returned +2.34% while VV returned +23.22%. Year to date, BSV is up 0.41% versus a gain of 13.62% for VV.
Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.28% per year against +21.70% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +12.98% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VV has the edge at +9.53% annualized vs +0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSV charges 0.03% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, BSV currently yields 3.98% against 1.25% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
BSV and VV share 5 holdings out of 3213 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSV | Weight in VV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUK | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| AFL | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.07% |
| KDP | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.06% |
| KVUE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LEN 4.75 11/29/27 | Pro | Pro | Pro |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSV or VV?
BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSV or VV?
Over the past year BSV returned +2.34% vs +23.22% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BSV annualized +0.91% vs +9.53% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSV or VV?
VV has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both BSV and VV?
BSV and VV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSV and VV?
BSV and VV share 5 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3213 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VV?
BSV yields 3.98% while VV yields 1.25%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.