BTOT vs VXUS
iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BTOT or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTOT | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $29M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.73% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 2,165 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -1.33% | +9.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.07% | +13.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.17% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BTOT vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BTOT vs VXUS Performance
iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTOT returned -1.07% while VXUS returned +13.33%. Year to date, BTOT is down 1.33% versus a gain of 9.82% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTOT charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTOT currently yields 3.73% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 855 holdings in BTOT and 8,463 in VXUS, totalling 73.7% and 89.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 855 positions we hold weights for in BTOT and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 2,165 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BTOT | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARGENT 4.125 07/09/3Republic Of Argentina Sr Unsecured 07/35 1.5 Var | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTOT and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTOT or VXUS?
BTOT has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTOT or VXUS?
Over the past year BTOT returned -1.07% vs +13.33% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTOT or VXUS?
BTOT yields 3.73% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so BTOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BTOT?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.