BUZZ vs IVV
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BUZZ or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUZZ led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. BUZZ is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUZZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $86M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 76 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.85% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.13% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.97%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.41% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.4% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.9% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,296 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 4, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.5 years).
BUZZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.
BUZZ vs IVV Performance
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is an ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BUZZ returned +18.13% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, BUZZ is up 12.85% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, BUZZ compounded at +31.97% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.41% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.50% annualized vs +9.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUZZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.9% for BUZZ and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUZZ charges 0.76% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUZZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
57.5% of BUZZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 45.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BUZZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
42 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in BUZZ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 76 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 456 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BUZZ (54.1% of the fund), and 31 for BUZZ that do not appear in IVV (37.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUZZ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.37% | 7.98% | 4.61% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.96% | 5.44% | 1.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.13% | 6.86% | 4.73% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.78% | 4.01% | 2.23% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.91% | 1.94% | 0.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 1.29% | 3.19% | 1.90% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.83% | 0.55% | 3.28% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.81% | 1.51% | 1.30% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 2.47% | 1.36% | 1.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.83% | 2.98% | 2.15% |
57.5% of BUZZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUZZ or IVV?
BUZZ has an expense ratio of 0.76% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUZZ or IVV?
Over the past year BUZZ returned +18.13% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BUZZ annualized +9.08% vs +15.50% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUZZ or IVV?
BUZZ has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BUZZ -56.9% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both BUZZ and IVV?
BUZZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUZZ and IVV?
57.5% of BUZZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 45.2% of IVV's is in holdings BUZZ also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in BUZZ and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUZZ or IVV?
BUZZ yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BUZZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUZZ led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. BUZZ is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.