BWQG vs VXUS
BWM Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BWQG or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWQG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $164.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 33 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | +6.19% | +12.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.26% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.40% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% |
| Fund Family | Burke Wealth Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BWQG vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BWQG vs VXUS Performance
BWM Quality Growth ETF (BWQG) is an ETF from Burke Wealth Management LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BWQG is up 6.19% versus a gain of 12.44% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWQG charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWQG currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 33 holdings in BWQG and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 100.0% and 89.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in BWQG and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 33 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BWQG and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWQG or VXUS?
BWQG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWQG or VXUS?
BWQG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BWQG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.