BWQG vs VTI

BWQG vs VTI

Which is better, BWQG or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBWQGVTI
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$36M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings793,543
YTD Return+2.22%+12.57%Best
1Y Return-+17.22%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.87%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Fund FamilyBurke Wealth Management LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BWQG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BWQG vs VTI Performance

BWM Quality Growth ETF (BWQG) is an ETF from Burke Wealth Management LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BWQG is up 2.22% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BWQG charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWQG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

BWQG already in VTI76.8%

At least 76.8% of BWQG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of BWQG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, BWQG as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

21 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BWQG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 79 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BWQGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.10.12%6.32%3.80%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.45%3.17%3.28%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.6.76%1.79%4.97%
GOOGAlphabet Inc5.22%2.27%2.95%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.5.85%0.00%5.85%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A3.96%0.25%3.71%
NOWServicenow, Inc.4.04%0.14%3.90%
VVisa Inc3.23%0.77%2.46%
TSLATesla Inc2.32%1.63%0.69%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc3.63%0.19%3.44%

76.8% of BWQG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BWQGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BWQG or VTI?

BWQG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BWQG and VTI?

At least 76.8% of BWQG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BWQG and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, BWQG or VTI?

BWQG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BWQG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.