CCFE vs VTI
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CCFE or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCFE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -11.22% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.48% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.2% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $9,667 | $12,849Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Concourse Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.3 years).
CCFE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CCFE vs VTI Performance
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) is an ETF from Concourse Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCFE returned -13.48% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, CCFE is down 11.22% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCFE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.1% for CCFE and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCFE charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCFE currently yields 0.02% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
88.3% of CCFE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings CCFE also owns.
Most of CCFE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in CCFE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,132 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CCFE (97.1% of the fund), and 1 for CCFE that do not appear in VTI (8.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCFE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPSCooper-standard Holdings Inc | 8.59% | 0.00% | 8.59% |
| CMCOColumbus Mckinnon Corporation Com | 5.85% | 0.00% | 5.85% |
| AAPAdvance Auto Parts Inc. | 5.54% | 0.00% | 5.54% |
| KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc | 5.00% | 0.01% | 4.99% |
| TLNTalen Energy Corp Common Stock USD.001 | 4.86% | 0.02% | 4.84% |
| TOIOncology Institute Inc/The | 4.83% | 0.00% | 4.83% |
| GXOGXO Logistics, Inc. | 4.29% | 0.01% | 4.28% |
| CNXCnx Resources Corp | 3.59% | 0.01% | 3.58% |
| SSNCSs&C Technologies Holdings Inc. | 3.55% | 0.02% | 3.53% |
| WCCWesco International Inc | 3.54% | 0.02% | 3.52% |
88.3% of CCFE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCFE or VTI?
CCFE has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCFE or VTI?
Over the past year CCFE returned -13.48% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CCFE annualized -2.57% vs +21.27% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCFE or VTI?
CCFE has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CCFE -25.1% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both CCFE and VTI?
CCFE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCFE and VTI?
88.3% of CCFE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's is in holdings CCFE also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in CCFE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCFE or VTI?
CCFE yields 0.02% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CCFE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.