CCNR vs SCHD
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. CCNR offers more diversification with 312 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $448M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.99% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 312 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +25.84% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +52.56% | +29.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CCNR vs SCHD Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CCNR returned +52.56% while SCHD returned +29.56%. Year to date, CCNR is up 25.84% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 2.99% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and SCHD share 7 holdings out of 399 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or SCHD?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or SCHD?
Over the past year CCNR returned +52.56% vs +29.56% for SCHD, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +30.07% vs +11.55% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or SCHD?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CCNR and SCHD?
CCNR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and SCHD?
CCNR and SCHD share 7 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 399 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or SCHD?
CCNR yields 2.99% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.