CCNR vs VOO
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CCNR or VOO?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CCNR led over 1Y and the full window. CCNR is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $473M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 312 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +20.72%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +40.75%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $16,831Best | $14,091 |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.5%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.2 years).
CCNR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
CCNR vs VOO Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +40.75% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, CCNR is up 20.72% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 12.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 2.74% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
9.3% of CCNR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.1% of VOO's money is in holdings CCNR also owns.
CCNR and VOO share little of their money.
23 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in CCNR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 312 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for CCNR (96.0% of the fund), and 73 for CCNR that do not appear in VOO (22.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCNR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.09% | 1.00% | 0.91% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 0.93% | 0.08% | 0.85% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.86% | 0.12% | 0.74% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 0.84% | 0.06% | 0.78% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.81% | 0.03% | 0.78% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 0.82% | 0.02% | 0.80% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 0.60% | 0.23% | 0.37% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 0.72% | 0.06% | 0.66% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.61% | 0.12% | 0.49% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.47% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCNR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCNR or VOO?
Over the past year CCNR returned +40.75% vs +16.61% for VOO, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +26.70% vs +16.87% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 12.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VOO?
CCNR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VOO?
9.3% of CCNR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.1% of VOO's is in holdings CCNR also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in CCNR and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR yields 2.74% while VOO yields 1.04%, so CCNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CCNR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CCNR led over 1Y and the full window. CCNR is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.