CCNR vs VOO
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $418M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.63% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.01% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CCNR vs VOO Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +54.01% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, CCNR is up 20.63% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 1.02% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and VOO share 20 holdings out of 791 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or VOO?
Over the past year CCNR returned +54.01% vs +22.62% for VOO, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +28.16% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VOO?
CCNR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VOO?
CCNR and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VOO?
CCNR yields 1.02% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.