CCNR vs IVV
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $418M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.10% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +52.60% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
CCNR vs IVV Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +52.60% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, CCNR is up 21.10% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 1.02% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and IVV share 20 holdings out of 791 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or IVV?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or IVV?
Over the past year CCNR returned +52.60% vs +21.64% for IVV, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +28.36% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or IVV?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CCNR and IVV?
CCNR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and IVV?
CCNR and IVV share 20 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or IVV?
CCNR yields 1.02% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.