CCNR vs VXUS
CCNR vs VXUS
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $418M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.61% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.39% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CCNR vs VXUS Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +51.39% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CCNR is up 18.61% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 1.02% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and VXUS share 171 holdings out of 7996 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCNR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPG34:BV | 1.17% | 0.28% | 0.89% |
| BOL:ST | 1.27% | 0.05% | 1.22% |
| EQNR:OS | 1.09% | 0.05% | 1.04% |
| IBE:MA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BTE:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TECK:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SPMM:MI | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AEM:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| NPI:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CS:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings CCNR shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VXUS?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or VXUS?
Over the past year CCNR returned +51.39% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +27.29% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VXUS?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VXUS?
CCNR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VXUS?
CCNR and VXUS share 171 common holdings with a 3.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7996 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VXUS?
CCNR yields 1.02% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.