CCNR vs VTI
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $418M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.10% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +52.60% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
CCNR vs VTI Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +52.60% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, CCNR is up 21.10% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 1.02% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and VTI share 64 holdings out of 3025 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VTI?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or VTI?
Over the past year CCNR returned +52.60% vs +22.19% for VTI, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +28.36% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VTI?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VTI?
CCNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VTI?
CCNR and VTI share 64 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3025 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VTI?
CCNR yields 1.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.