CCNR vs VYM
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CCNR or VYM?
Commodities against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CCNR led over 1Y and the full window. CCNR is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $473M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 312 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +20.00%Best | +11.47% |
| 1Y Return | +39.17%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $16,697Best | $13,898 |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.5%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 11, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.2 years).
CCNR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
CCNR vs VYM Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +39.17% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, CCNR is up 20.00% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 2.74% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
16.2% of CCNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.4% of VYM's money is in holdings CCNR also owns.
CCNR and VYM share little of their money.
40 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in CCNR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 312 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 489 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CCNR (89.7% of the fund), and 57 for CCNR that do not appear in VYM (15.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCNR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.09% | 2.63% | 2.54% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.10% | 1.48% | 1.38% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.54% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 0.84% | 0.17% | 0.67% |
| MURMurphy Oil Corp | 0.98% | 0.02% | 0.96% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.35% | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.61% | 0.30% | 0.31% |
| PRPermian Resource | 0.83% | 0.07% | 0.76% |
| OASChord Energy Corp | 0.86% | 0.03% | 0.83% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.81% | 0.08% | 0.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCNR and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCNR or VYM?
Over the past year CCNR returned +39.17% vs +15.94% for VYM, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +26.24% vs +16.14% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VYM?
CCNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VYM?
16.2% of CCNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.4% of VYM's is in holdings CCNR also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 300 positions we hold weights for in CCNR and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR yields 2.74% while VYM yields 2.22%, so CCNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CCNR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CCNR led over 1Y and the full window. CCNR is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.