CCNR vs VYM
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CCNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCNR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $418M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 311 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +20.95% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.41% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CCNR vs VYM Performance
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCNR returned +54.41% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, CCNR is up 20.95% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for CCNR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCNR charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCNR currently yields 1.02% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CCNR and VYM share 39 holdings out of 825 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCNR or VYM?
Over the past year CCNR returned +54.41% vs +25.99% for VYM, so CCNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCNR annualized +28.37% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CCNR -19.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CCNR and VYM?
CCNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCNR and VYM?
CCNR and VYM share 39 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 825 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCNR or VYM?
CCNR yields 1.02% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.