CGCV vs XLSR
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs State Street US Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, CGCV or XLSR?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 0.41% |
| Holdings | 148 | 47 |
| YTD Return | +11.84%Best | +5.66% |
| 1Y Return | +13.45%Best | +6.67% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -20.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $14,149Best | $13,100 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.4%Best | 90.6% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Apr 2, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2.4 years).
CGCV vs XLSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs XLSR Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year CGCV returned +13.45% while XLSR returned +6.67%. Year to date, CGCV is up 11.84% versus a gain of 5.66% for XLSR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -20.6% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $70 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.53% against 0.41% for XLSR.
Holdings Overlap
19.9% of CGCV's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 18.8% of XLSR's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
CGCV and XLSR share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 22 in XLSR, against full books of 148 and 47.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for XLSR that do not appear in our book for CGCV (81.3% of the fund), and 63 for CGCV that do not appear in XLSR (75.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGCV and XLSR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or XLSR?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while XLSR charges 0.70%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or XLSR?
Over the past year CGCV returned +13.45% vs +6.67% for XLSR, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +15.56% vs +11.91% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or XLSR?
XLSR has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs XLSR -20.6%.
Should I hold both CGCV and XLSR?
CGCV and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and XLSR?
19.9% of CGCV's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 18.8% of XLSR's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 22 in XLSR.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or XLSR?
CGCV yields 1.53% while XLSR yields 0.41%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLSR better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.