CGRO vs QQQ
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CGRO or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.41% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 33 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -27.57% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | -35.83% | +24.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.06% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.06% | +17.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.5% | 20.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,541 | $21,924Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.3 years).
CGRO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
CGRO vs QQQ Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CGRO returned -35.83% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, CGRO is down 27.57% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +1.06% per year against +29.05% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.06% and +17.00% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.37% annualized vs +12.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.5% compared with 20.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for CGRO and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.41% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
6.6% of CGRO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 3.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGRO also owns.
CGRO and QQQ share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 33 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CGRO (94.6% of the fund), and 3 for CGRO that do not appear in QQQ (9.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGRO and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or QQQ?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGRO or QQQ?
Over the past year CGRO returned -35.83% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CGRO annualized +12.71% vs +20.37% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGRO or QQQ?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 61.5% annualized versus 20.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CGRO -42.1% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both CGRO and QQQ?
CGRO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and QQQ?
6.6% of CGRO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 3.1% of QQQ's is in holdings CGRO also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or QQQ?
CGRO yields 3.41% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CGRO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.