CGRO vs VTI
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -19.35% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -18.79% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.04% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.04% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
CGRO vs VTI Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is a ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGRO returned -18.79% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, CGRO is down 19.35% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +5.04% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.04% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, CGRO has the edge at +15.01% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for CGRO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGRO and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGRO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 3.94% | 1.63% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGRO or VTI?
Over the past year CGRO returned -18.79% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CGRO annualized +15.01% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 62.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGRO -42.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGRO and VTI?
CGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and VTI?
CGRO and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO yields 3.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.