CGRO vs VTI
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGRO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.41% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -23.68% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | -29.75% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.89% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.89% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.0% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,531 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2020 to Sep 22, 2026 (6.2 years).
CGRO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
CGRO vs VTI Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGRO returned -29.75% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, CGRO is down 23.68% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +2.89% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.89% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +17.06% annualized vs +13.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.0% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for CGRO and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.41% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of CGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's money is in holdings CGRO also owns.
CGRO and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 35 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGRO (96.2% of the fund), and 4 for CGRO that do not appear in VTI (11.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGRO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.05% | 1.22% | 2.83% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGRO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGRO or VTI?
Over the past year CGRO returned -29.75% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CGRO annualized +13.72% vs +17.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 62.0% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGRO -42.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both CGRO and VTI?
CGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and VTI?
4.0% of CGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's is in holdings CGRO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or VTI?
CGRO yields 3.41% while VTI yields 1.03%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGRO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.