CGRO vs VOO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -20.18% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.14% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.58% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.58% | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CGRO vs VOO Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is a ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGRO returned -22.14% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, CGRO is down 20.18% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +4.58% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.58% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, CGRO has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs +13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for CGRO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CGRO and VOO share 1 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGRO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 3.38% | 1.84% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or VOO?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGRO or VOO?
Over the past year CGRO returned -22.14% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CGRO annualized +14.71% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGRO or VOO?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 62.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CGRO -42.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CGRO and VOO?
CGRO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and VOO?
CGRO and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or VOO?
CGRO yields 3.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.