CGRO vs RJCA
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, CGRO or RJCA?
RJCA has been ahead.
RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. RJCA is less concentrated, with 53.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $607M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.41% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 33 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -25.67% | +7.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -31.69% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.93% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.93% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0% | 53.5%Best |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CGRO vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGRO vs RJCA Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, CGRO is down 25.67% versus a gain of 7.23% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $61 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.41% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
4.2% of CGRO's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 2.1% of RJCA's money is in holdings CGRO also owns.
CGRO and RJCA share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 72 days apart, CGRO as of Sep 10, 2026 and RJCA as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 33 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for CGRO (97.9% of the fund), and 4 for CGRO that do not appear in RJCA (11.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGRO | Weight in RJCA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.23% | 2.08% | 2.15% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGRO and RJCA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or RJCA?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while RJCA charges 0.61%. RJCA is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and RJCA?
4.2% of CGRO's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 2.1% of RJCA's is in holdings CGRO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 71 in RJCA.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or RJCA?
CGRO yields 3.41% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than CGRO?
RJCA has a lower expense ratio. RJCA led over 1Y. RJCA is less concentrated, with 53.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.