CHGX vs QQQ
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CHGX or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CHGX is less concentrated, with 13.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CHGX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $176M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 203 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +22.07% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.34% | +24.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.50% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.39% | +17.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 19.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,715 | $21,924Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.0%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | STANCE Capital | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2017 to Oct 2, 2026 (9 years).
CHGX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
CHGX vs QQQ Performance
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF (CHGX) is an ETF from STANCE Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CHGX returned +21.34% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, CHGX is up 22.07% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, CHGX compounded at +5.50% per year against +29.05% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.39% and +17.00% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.29% annualized vs +7.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CHGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 19.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.3% for CHGX and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CHGX charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CHGX currently yields 0.54% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
29.6% of CHGX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 44.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings CHGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CHGX and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 203 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 66 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CHGX (53.4% of the fund), and 68 for CHGX that do not appear in QQQ (69.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CHGX | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.07% | 8.45% | 7.38% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.12% | 7.80% | 6.68% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.08% | 4.85% | 3.77% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.11% | 3.71% | 2.60% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.96% | 2.28% | 1.32% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.93% | 1.95% | 1.02% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.91% | 1.60% | 0.69% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.24% | 1.19% | 0.05% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.93% | 1.44% | 0.51% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.98% | 1.07% | 0.09% |
44.4% of QQQ is already inside CHGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CHGX or QQQ?
CHGX has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CHGX or QQQ?
Over the past year CHGX returned +21.34% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CHGX annualized +7.94% vs +20.29% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CHGX or QQQ?
CHGX has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 19.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CHGX -47.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both CHGX and QQQ?
CHGX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CHGX and QQQ?
44.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings CHGX also owns. 44.4% of QQQ's is in holdings CHGX also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CHGX and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CHGX or QQQ?
CHGX yields 0.54% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so CHGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CHGX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CHGX is less concentrated, with 13.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.