CIBR vs VYM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CIBR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIBR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $14.0B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +44.97% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.06% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.69% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.43% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CIBR vs VYM Performance
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CIBR returned +41.06% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, CIBR is up 44.97% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, CIBR compounded at +31.69% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +16.43% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CIBR has the edge at +16.07% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for CIBR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIBR charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIBR currently yields 0.46% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CIBR and VYM share 7 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CIBR or VYM?
Over the past year CIBR returned +41.06% vs +24.43% for VYM, so CIBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CIBR annualized +16.07% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CIBR -33.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CIBR and VYM?
CIBR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CIBR and VYM?
CIBR and VYM share 7 common holdings with a 9.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR yields 0.46% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.