CIBR vs VYM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CIBR or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CIBR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIBR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15.9B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 88 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +35.21%Best | +15.29% |
| 1Y Return | +32.73%Best | +22.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.92%Best | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20%Best | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,588Best | $17,734 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 7, 2015 to Sep 3, 2026 (11.2 years).
CIBR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
CIBR vs VYM Performance
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CIBR returned +32.73% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, CIBR is up 35.21% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, CIBR compounded at +26.92% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.20% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CIBR has the edge at +15.26% annualized vs +9.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for CIBR and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIBR charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIBR currently yields 0.43% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.9% of CIBR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.8% of VYM's money is in holdings CIBR also owns.
CIBR and VYM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CIBR and 603 in VYM, against full books of 88 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 562 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CIBR (86.6% of the fund), and 28 for CIBR that do not appear in VYM (69.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CIBR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.85% | 7.29% | 0.44% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 7.39% | 1.93% | 5.46% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.45% | 1.10% | 0.35% |
| GENGen Digital Inc | 2.21% | 0.06% | 2.15% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 1.98% | 0.29% | 1.69% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.96% | 0.13% | 1.83% |
| BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. | 1.23% | 0.03% | 1.20% |
| SAICScience Applications International Corp | 0.83% | 0.02% | 0.81% |
23.9% of CIBR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CIBR or VYM?
Over the past year CIBR returned +32.73% vs +22.23% for VYM, so CIBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CIBR annualized +15.26% vs +9.81% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CIBR -33.9% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both CIBR and VYM?
CIBR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CIBR and VYM?
23.9% of CIBR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.8% of VYM's is in holdings CIBR also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CIBR and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIBR or VYM?
CIBR yields 0.43% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CIBR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CIBR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.