CIBR vs VOO
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CIBR or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CIBR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIBR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15.9B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 88 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +34.18%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +31.44%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.57%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.29%Best | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,662Best | $18,335 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.7% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 7, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.2 years).
CIBR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
CIBR vs VOO Performance
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CIBR returned +31.44% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, CIBR is up 34.18% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, CIBR compounded at +26.57% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.29% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CIBR has the edge at +15.18% annualized vs +13.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for CIBR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIBR charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIBR currently yields 0.43% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
65.8% of CIBR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.1% of VOO's money is in holdings CIBR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CIBR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 88 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for CIBR (86.4% of the fund), and 19 for CIBR that do not appear in VOO (27.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CIBR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 9.43% | 0.43% | 9.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 6.85% | 2.77% | 4.08% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 8.71% | 0.15% | 8.56% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A | 8.41% | 0.30% | 8.11% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 7.39% | 0.72% | 6.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.98% | 4.30% | 2.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 1.74% | 3.25% | 1.51% |
| FFIVF5 Networks Inc. | 3.11% | 0.04% | 3.07% |
| AKAMAkamai Technologies Inc. | 2.70% | 0.03% | 2.67% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.26% | 0.27% | 1.99% |
65.8% of CIBR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIBR or VOO?
CIBR has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CIBR or VOO?
Over the past year CIBR returned +31.44% vs +20.08% for VOO, so CIBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CIBR annualized +15.18% vs +13.25% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CIBR or VOO?
CIBR has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CIBR -33.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CIBR and VOO?
CIBR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CIBR and VOO?
65.8% of CIBR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.1% of VOO's is in holdings CIBR also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CIBR and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIBR or VOO?
CIBR yields 0.43% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CIBR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CIBR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.