CMCI vs IVV
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CMCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMCI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.12% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +28.71% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.83% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.04% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.04% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13752483.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
CMCI vs IVV Performance
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CMCI returned +22.83% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, CMCI is up 28.71% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, CMCI compounded at +9.04% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.04% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, CMCI has the edge at +29.75% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CMCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13752483.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for CMCI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMCI charges 0.67% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $3 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMCI currently yields 8.12% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CMCI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMCI or IVV?
CMCI has an expense ratio of 0.67% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CMCI or IVV?
Over the past year CMCI returned +22.83% vs +20.94% for IVV, so CMCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CMCI annualized +29.75% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CMCI or IVV?
CMCI has been the more volatile fund at 13752483.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CMCI -100.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CMCI and IVV?
CMCI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CMCI and IVV?
CMCI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMCI or IVV?
CMCI yields 8.12% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CMCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.