CMCI vs VXUS

CMCI vs VXUS

Which is better, CMCI or VXUS?

Commodities against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CMCI led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 3Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCMCIVXUS
Expense Ratio0.67%0.05%Best
AUM$3M$158.1B
Dividend Yield7.63%2.51%
Holdings198,747
YTD Return+33.00%Best+12.44%
1Y Return+23.96%Best+20.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+9.57%+19.97%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.91%Best+8.99%
Volatility (annualized)13705943.7%15.1%Best
Max Drawdown--39.9%
$10,000 over 5 years$16,039Best$15,379
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 21, 2023Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2011 to Sep 24, 2026 (15.4 years).

CMCI vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CMCI vs VXUS Performance

VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMCI returned +23.96% while VXUS returned +20.21%. Year to date, CMCI is up 33.00% versus a gain of 12.44% for VXUS.

Over three years, CMCI compounded at +9.57% per year against +19.97% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.91% and +8.99% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, CMCI has the edge at +29.82% annualized vs +4.38%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CMCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13705943.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CMCI charges 0.67% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $5 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMCI currently yields 7.63% against 2.51% for VXUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CMCI and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CMCIVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CMCI or VXUS?

CMCI has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CMCI or VXUS?

Over the past year CMCI returned +23.96% vs +20.21% for VXUS, so CMCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CMCI annualized +29.82% vs +4.38% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CMCI or VXUS?

CMCI has been the more volatile fund at 13705943.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS.

Should I hold both CMCI and VXUS?

CMCI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CMCI or VXUS?

CMCI yields 7.63% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so CMCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than CMCI?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CMCI led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.