CMCI vs VXUS
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMCI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.63% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +22.92% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.15% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.47% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.47% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13752483.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CMCI vs VXUS Performance
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMCI returned +18.15% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CMCI is up 22.92% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CMCI compounded at +7.47% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.47% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, CMCI has the edge at +29.44% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CMCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13752483.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for CMCI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMCI charges 0.67% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $5 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMCI currently yields 8.63% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CMCI and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7864 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMCI or VXUS?
CMCI has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CMCI or VXUS?
Over the past year CMCI returned +18.15% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CMCI annualized +29.44% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CMCI or VXUS?
CMCI has been the more volatile fund at 13752483.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CMCI -100.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CMCI and VXUS?
CMCI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CMCI and VXUS?
CMCI and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7864 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMCI or VXUS?
CMCI yields 8.63% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CMCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.