CMCI vs VYM
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CMCI or VYM?
Commodities against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CMCI led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMCI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.63% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 19 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +33.00%Best | +9.71% |
| 1Y Return | +23.96%Best | +13.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.57% | +17.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.91% | +11.45%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13705943.7% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,039 | $17,195Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2011 to Sep 24, 2026 (15.4 years).
CMCI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.4 years both funds cover.
CMCI vs VYM Performance
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMCI returned +23.96% while VYM returned +13.77%. Year to date, CMCI is up 33.00% versus a gain of 9.71% for VYM.
Over three years, CMCI compounded at +9.57% per year against +17.30% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.91% and +11.45% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, CMCI has the edge at +29.82% annualized vs +9.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CMCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13705943.7% compared with 13.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMCI charges 0.67% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $4 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMCI currently yields 7.63% against 2.22% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CMCI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CMCI or VYM?
Over the past year CMCI returned +23.96% vs +13.77% for VYM, so CMCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CMCI annualized +29.82% vs +9.56% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI has been the more volatile fund at 13705943.7% annualized versus 13.0% for VYM.
Should I hold both CMCI and VYM?
CMCI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI yields 7.63% while VYM yields 2.22%, so CMCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CMCI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CMCI led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.