CMCI vs VYM
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CMCI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMCI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.12% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +31.03% | +15.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.97% | +22.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.81% | +18.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.57% | +12.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13705943.7% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CMCI vs VYM Performance
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMCI returned +22.97% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, CMCI is up 31.03% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, CMCI compounded at +8.81% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.57% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, CMCI has the edge at +29.82% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CMCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13705943.7% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for CMCI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMCI charges 0.67% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $4 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMCI currently yields 8.12% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CMCI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CMCI or VYM?
Over the past year CMCI returned +22.97% vs +22.23% for VYM, so CMCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CMCI annualized +29.82% vs +7.02% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI has been the more volatile fund at 13705943.7% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CMCI -100.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CMCI and VYM?
CMCI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CMCI and VYM?
CMCI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMCI or VYM?
CMCI yields 8.12% while VYM yields 2.24%, so CMCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.