COWG vs REGS
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, COWG or REGS?
COWG has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y. COWG is less concentrated, with 27.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COWG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 204 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +18.17%Best | +16.92% |
| 1Y Return | +14.37% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.43% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.7%Best | 49.2% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2022 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
COWG vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
COWG vs REGS Performance
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, COWG is up 18.17% versus a gain of 16.92% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COWG charges 0.49% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $35 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COWG currently yields 0.35% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
21.1% of COWG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 41.1% of REGS's money is in holdings COWG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in COWG and 60 in REGS, against full books of 204 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for COWG (54.7% of the fund), and 83 for COWG that do not appear in REGS (78.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COWG | Weight in REGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.06% | 11.05% | 9.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.96% | 8.14% | 7.18% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.77% | 5.63% | 4.86% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 4.08% | 0.97% | 3.11% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 3.42% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 1.32% | 1.88% | 0.56% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.32% | 1.30% | 0.02% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.85% | 1.69% | 0.84% |
| NTNXNutanix Inc - A | 1.05% | 1.09% | 0.04% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 0.69% | 1.34% | 0.65% |
41.1% of REGS is already inside COWG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COWG or REGS?
COWG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between COWG and REGS?
41.1% of REGS's money is in holdings COWG also owns. 41.1% of REGS's is in holdings COWG also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in COWG and 60 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, COWG or REGS?
COWG yields 0.35% while REGS yields 0.00%, so COWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than COWG?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y. COWG is less concentrated, with 27.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.