CSCS vs IVV
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.62% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -42.56% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -46.23% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CSCS vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF (CSCS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CSCS returned -46.23% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, CSCS is down 42.56% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.6% for CSCS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCS charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCS currently yields 4.62% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CSCS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCS or IVV?
CSCS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSCS or IVV?
Over the past year CSCS returned -46.23% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCS annualized -44.51% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSCS or IVV?
CSCS has been the more volatile fund at 27.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CSCS -51.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CSCS and IVV?
CSCS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSCS and IVV?
CSCS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCS or IVV?
CSCS yields 4.62% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.