CSCS vs VTI
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CSCS or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.63, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.42% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 16 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -37.14% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -43.86% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.7% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $5,547 | $12,920Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.3 years).
CSCS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CSCS vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF (CSCS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSCS returned -43.86% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, CSCS is down 37.14% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 11.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.6% for CSCS and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.63. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCS charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCS currently yields 4.42% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in CSCS and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 93.4% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, CSCS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in CSCS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 16 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CSCS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCS or VTI?
CSCS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSCS or VTI?
Over the past year CSCS returned -43.86% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCS annualized -36.45% vs +21.78% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSCS or VTI?
CSCS has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 11.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CSCS -51.6% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both CSCS and VTI?
CSCS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.63, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCS or VTI?
CSCS yields 4.42% while VTI yields 1.03%, so CSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CSCS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.63, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.