CSCS vs VYM
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.62% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -37.51% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -42.33% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CSCS vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X ETF (CSCS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSCS returned -42.33% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, CSCS is down 37.51% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.6% for CSCS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCS charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCS currently yields 4.62% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CSCS and VYM share 0 holdings out of 561 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCS or VYM?
CSCS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSCS or VYM?
Over the past year CSCS returned -42.33% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCS annualized -40.14% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSCS or VYM?
CSCS has been the more volatile fund at 27.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CSCS -51.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CSCS and VYM?
CSCS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSCS and VYM?
CSCS and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 561 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCS or VYM?
CSCS yields 4.62% while VYM yields 2.86%, so CSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.